The difference between European crane and traditional crane
- Categories:Industry knowledge
- Author:
- Origin:
- Time of issue:2018-09-05
- Views:18
(Summary description)
1. From the design structure point of view: ①European crane: the main girder adopts the box girder structure, which has a reasonable structure and higher strength. Effective working space, the largest clearance difference, up to 1.5 meters, the wheel pressure is reduced, and the rail-bearing beam is reduced; ② Traditional crane: limited by the hoist design, only the traditional I-beam structure can be used, the structure is unreasonable and the utilization rate The combination of the hoist and the lower flange of the main girder leads to a high incidence of breakaway accidents. 2. From the appearance: ①European crane: The appearance is light and beautiful, in line with modern industrial aesthetics, effectively using the workshop space, the limit distance between the hook and the walls on both sides is small, the headroom is low, and the layout planning of the existing workshop is more Flexible, the new workshop can be designed to be smaller and have more complete functions; ②Traditional crane: the appearance is thick, heavy, the limit size in vertical and horizontal directions is large, and the effective working area is small. Under the same workshop structure, the space utilization rate is low. . 3. In terms of volume: ①European crane: the lowest headroom, the smallest self-weight, good wind resistance, good running balance, safe and reliable; ②traditional crane: large amount of steel, relatively large volume, large impact, and shaking of the load severe. 4. From the installation design point of view: ①European crane: fully enclosed design, not attached to dust, frequency conversion speed regulation, safer to use; ②Traditional crane: The structure of the reduction box is open, exposed to the air, and easy to attach to dust. 5. From the perspective of operation and maintenance costs: ①European crane: the whole machine has low power, low power consumption, reliable quality, and low failure rate during correct use, which can minimize the loss caused by equipment failure and production. It also saves equipment maintenance costs; ②traditional cranes: the power of the whole machine is large, the operation cost is high and the power consumption is high. The parts have a short life span and a high failure rate due to cost constraints during the use of the crane. cost.
The difference between European crane and traditional crane
(Summary description)
1. From the design structure point of view: ①European crane: the main girder adopts the box girder structure, which has a reasonable structure and higher strength. Effective working space, the largest clearance difference, up to 1.5 meters, the wheel pressure is reduced, and the rail-bearing beam is reduced; ② Traditional crane: limited by the hoist design, only the traditional I-beam structure can be used, the structure is unreasonable and the utilization rate The combination of the hoist and the lower flange of the main girder leads to a high incidence of breakaway accidents. 2. From the appearance: ①European crane: The appearance is light and beautiful, in line with modern industrial aesthetics, effectively using the workshop space, the limit distance between the hook and the walls on both sides is small, the headroom is low, and the layout planning of the existing workshop is more Flexible, the new workshop can be designed to be smaller and have more complete functions; ②Traditional crane: the appearance is thick, heavy, the limit size in vertical and horizontal directions is large, and the effective working area is small. Under the same workshop structure, the space utilization rate is low. . 3. In terms of volume: ①European crane: the lowest headroom, the smallest self-weight, good wind resistance, good running balance, safe and reliable; ②traditional crane: large amount of steel, relatively large volume, large impact, and shaking of the load severe. 4. From the installation design point of view: ①European crane: fully enclosed design, not attached to dust, frequency conversion speed regulation, safer to use; ②Traditional crane: The structure of the reduction box is open, exposed to the air, and easy to attach to dust. 5. From the perspective of operation and maintenance costs: ①European crane: the whole machine has low power, low power consumption, reliable quality, and low failure rate during correct use, which can minimize the loss caused by equipment failure and production. It also saves equipment maintenance costs; ②traditional cranes: the power of the whole machine is large, the operation cost is high and the power consumption is high. The parts have a short life span and a high failure rate due to cost constraints during the use of the crane. cost.
- Categories:Industry knowledge
- Author:
- Origin:
- Time of issue:2018-09-05
- Views:18
1. From the design structure point of view: ①European crane: the main girder adopts the box girder structure, which has a reasonable structure and higher strength. Effective working space, the largest clearance difference, up to 1.5 meters, the wheel pressure is reduced, and the rail-bearing beam is reduced; ② Traditional crane: limited by the hoist design, only the traditional I-beam structure can be used, the structure is unreasonable and the utilization rate The combination of the hoist and the lower flange of the main girder leads to a high incidence of breakaway accidents. 2. From the appearance: ①European crane: The appearance is light and beautiful, in line with modern industrial aesthetics, effectively using the workshop space, the limit distance between the hook and the walls on both sides is small, the headroom is low, and the layout planning of the existing workshop is more Flexible, the new workshop can be designed to be smaller and have more complete functions; ②Traditional crane: the appearance is thick, heavy, the limit size in vertical and horizontal directions is large, and the effective working area is small. Under the same workshop structure, the space utilization rate is low. . 3. In terms of volume: ①European crane: the lowest headroom, the smallest self-weight, good wind resistance, good running balance, safe and reliable; ②traditional crane: large amount of steel, relatively large volume, large impact, and shaking of the load severe. 4. From the installation design point of view: ①European crane: fully enclosed design, not attached to dust, frequency conversion speed regulation, safer to use; ②Traditional crane: The structure of the reduction box is open, exposed to the air, and easy to attach to dust. 5. From the perspective of operation and maintenance costs: ①European crane: the whole machine has low power, low power consumption, reliable quality, and low failure rate during correct use, which can minimize the loss caused by equipment failure and production. It also saves equipment maintenance costs; ②traditional cranes: the power of the whole machine is large, the operation cost is high and the power consumption is high. The parts have a short life span and a high failure rate due to cost constraints during the use of the crane. cost.
Scan the QR code to read on your phone
Recommended News
Contact Details
Fax:+86 771-7668889
Email:gxfy168@126.com
Address:Konggang Avenue, Fuzhou Economic Zone, Nanning, China-ASEAN
Copyright © Guangxi Fengyuan Steel Structure Co., Ltd. All Rights Reserved 桂ICP备13000549号-1 SEO 网站支持IPV6